ETF Overlap Tool: VUG vs MGK
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, mega-cap growth concentration, and expense ratio differences between Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares (VUG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares (MGK).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (VUG vs MGK)
73 Assets| Asset | Sector | VUG Weight | MGK Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
VUG vs MGK: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares (VUG) versus Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares (MGK), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. VUG holds 0 total assets while MGK contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 41 common stock holdings, representing a 81.3% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: VUG concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (56.32%), whereas MGK allocates its highest weighting to Information Technology (58.58%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Alphabet Inc (GOOGL).
- Holdings Distribution: VUG features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in MGK, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: High Overlap & Concentration Risk
Holding both VUG and MGK results in significant portfolio duplication with a 81.3% weight overlap. Because a major portion of performance is driven by identical holdings across both funds, owning both simultaneously creates high redundancy without providing meaningful diversification.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: VUG vs MGK
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
VUG charges a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to MGK at 0.07%. VUG is 1.8x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $3 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
VUG and MGK react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining VUG and MGK impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: VUG's largest sector is Information Technology (56.32%), whereas MGK's largest sector is Information Technology (58.58%).
- Expense Ratio: VUG has an expense ratio of 0.04%, while MGK charges 0.07%. VUG is 1.8x cheaper than MGK.
- Portfolio Breadth: VUG holds 0 total stocks vs MGK's 0 stocks.

