ETF Overlap Tool: FDVV vs SCHD
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, tech concentration risk, and expense ratio differences between Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (FDVV vs SCHD)
89 Assets| Asset | Sector | FDVV Weight | SCHD Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
FDVV vs SCHD: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) versus Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. FDVV holds 100 total assets while SCHD contains 100 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 10 common stock holdings, representing a 12.5% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: FDVV concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (29.99%), whereas SCHD allocates its highest weighting to Healthcare (21.72%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include The Coca-Cola Company (KO), The Home Depot, Inc (HD), The Procter & Gamble Company (PG), PepsiCo, Inc (PEP).
- Holdings Distribution: FDVV features 100 holdings compared to 100 holdings in SCHD, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: Low Overlap & Strong Complementary Diversification
Holding both FDVV and SCHD offers low portfolio duplication with only a 12.5% weight overlap. With 10 shared stocks, these two funds focus on different market segments, making them highly complementary for investors seeking targeted multi-asset diversification.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: FDVV vs SCHD
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
SCHD charges a lower expense ratio of 0.06% compared to FDVV at 0.15%. SCHD is 2.5x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $9 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
FDVV and SCHD react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining FDVV and SCHD impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: FDVV's largest sector is Information Technology (29.99%), whereas SCHD's largest sector is Healthcare (21.72%).
- Expense Ratio: SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06%, while FDVV charges 0.15%. SCHD is 2.5x cheaper than FDVV.
- Portfolio Breadth: FDVV holds 100 total stocks vs SCHD's 100 stocks.

