ETF Overlap Tool: VNQ vs SCHH
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, real estate sector concentration, and expense ratio differences between Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF Shares (VNQ) and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (VNQ vs SCHH)
73 Assets| Asset | Sector | VNQ Weight | SCHH Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
VNQ vs SCHH: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF Shares (VNQ) versus Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. VNQ holds 0 total assets while SCHH contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 45 common stock holdings, representing a 67.3% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: VNQ concentrates its largest allocation in Real Estate (99.45%), whereas SCHH allocates its highest weighting to Real Estate (100.0%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include Welltower Inc (WELL), Prologis, Inc (PLD), Equinix, Inc. (REIT) (EQIX), Digital Realty Trust, Inc (DLR).
- Holdings Distribution: VNQ features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in SCHH, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: High Overlap & Concentration Risk
Holding both VNQ and SCHH results in significant portfolio duplication with a 67.3% weight overlap. Because a major portion of performance is driven by identical holdings across both funds, owning both simultaneously creates high redundancy without providing meaningful diversification.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: VNQ vs SCHH
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
SCHH charges a lower expense ratio of 0.07% compared to VNQ at 0.12%. SCHH is 1.7x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $5 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
VNQ and SCHH react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining VNQ and SCHH impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: VNQ's largest sector is Real Estate (99.45%), whereas SCHH's largest sector is Real Estate (100.0%).
- Expense Ratio: SCHH has an expense ratio of 0.07%, while VNQ charges 0.12%. SCHH is 1.7x cheaper than VNQ.
- Portfolio Breadth: VNQ holds 0 total stocks vs SCHH's 0 stocks.

