Home ETF Overlap QQQM vs FTEC

ETF Overlap Tool: QQQM vs FTEC

Compare portfolio holdings overlap, tech concentration risk, and expense ratio differences between Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).

Start tracking portfolio

Connect your brokerage and see your actual compounding, dividends, and full ETF overlap — automatically.
ETF Overlap Overview & Key Metrics
VOO (503 Total) QQQ (101 Total) ONLY IN QQQM 26 Stocks (53.6% Weight) MODERATE HOLDINGS OVERLAP 24 Shared Stocks (48.0%) 50.6% Weight Duplication ONLY IN FTEC 26 Stocks (53.6% Weight)
Overlap by Weight
50.6%
⚡ High Tech Concentration Overlap
Expense Ratio Gap
0.15% vs 0.084%
FTEC is 1.8x cheaper than QQQM
Unique Holdings
419 vs 17 Stocks
~53.6% Weight Difference
Sector Allocation Breakdown
Information Technology
58.71%
Communication Services
13.0%
Consumer Discretionary
11.12%
Consumer Staples
6.26%
Healthcare
4.1%
Industrials
3.92%
Utilities
1.16%
Materials
0.98%
Energy
0.53%
Financials
0.22%
Information Technology
99.29%
Industrials
0.32%
Financials
0.31%
Consumer Discretionary
0.08%

Want to check your entire portfolio for hidden ETF overlap & model future allocation?

Connect your brokerage account to automatically analyze compounding and overlap, or use Portfolio Lab to model and backtest custom ETF allocations with real historical data.

Stock Holdings Breakdown (QQQM vs FTEC)

73 Assets
Asset Sector QQQM Weight FTEC Weight Combined (50/50) Status

QQQM vs FTEC: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide

When evaluating Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) versus Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. QQQM holds 0 total assets while FTEC contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 24 common stock holdings, representing a 50.6% portfolio overlap by weight.

Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings

While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:

  • Primary Sector Focus: QQQM concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (58.71%), whereas FTEC allocates its highest weighting to Information Technology (99.29%).
  • Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Micron Technology, Inc (MU).
  • Holdings Distribution: QQQM features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in FTEC, affecting single-stock concentration risk.

Strategic Portfolio Insight: Moderate Overlap & Balanced Dual Exposure

Combining QQQM and FTEC creates a moderate portfolio overlap of 50.6% by weight. While they share 24 common holdings, each ETF offers distinct sector weightings and strategy tilts that can complement a broader asset allocation strategy.

Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: QQQM vs FTEC

Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:

1. Annual Management Fee Impact

FTEC charges a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to QQQM at 0.15%. FTEC is 1.8x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $7 per year for every $100,000 invested.

2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential

QQQM and FTEC react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.

Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight

Want to analyze how combining QQQM and FTEC impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.

Frequently Asked Questions: QQQM vs FTEC ETF Overlap
What is the portfolio overlap percentage between QQQM and FTEC?
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) have a 50.6% overlap by weight and share 24 identical stock holdings. QQQM holds 0 total assets while FTEC holds 0 total assets.
What is the main difference between QQQM and FTEC?
The main difference between QQQM and FTEC lies in sector allocation, expense ratio, and portfolio breadth:
  • Sector Focus: QQQM's largest sector is Information Technology (58.71%), whereas FTEC's largest sector is Information Technology (99.29%).
  • Expense Ratio: FTEC has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. FTEC is 1.8x cheaper than QQQM.
  • Portfolio Breadth: QQQM holds 0 total stocks vs FTEC's 0 stocks.
Is it good to hold both QQQM and FTEC in the same portfolio?
Holding both QQQM and FTEC results in a 50.6% portfolio weight overlap across 24 common holdings. With a moderate weight overlap of 50.6%, holding both QQQM and FTEC can provide balanced dual exposure if you want to tilt toward specific sector weightings while maintaining broader market coverage.
Which ETF has lower management expense fees: QQQM or FTEC?
FTEC has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. FTEC is 1.8x cheaper than QQQM.
Which ETF is better for long-term investors: QQQM or FTEC?
The ideal choice depends on your investment strategy: QQQM (0.15% expense ratio) provides exposure to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, while FTEC (0.08% expense ratio) offers exposure to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF. Comparing sector concentration and historical volatility helps align your choice with long-term goals.
Do QQQM and FTEC pay dividends?
Yes, both QQQM and FTEC pay quarterly dividend distributions to shareholders derived from underlying dividend payments of portfolio companies.