ETF Overlap Tool: QQQM vs FTEC
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, tech concentration risk, and expense ratio differences between Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (QQQM vs FTEC)
73 Assets| Asset | Sector | QQQM Weight | FTEC Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
QQQM vs FTEC: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) versus Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. QQQM holds 0 total assets while FTEC contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 24 common stock holdings, representing a 50.6% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: QQQM concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (58.71%), whereas FTEC allocates its highest weighting to Information Technology (99.29%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Micron Technology, Inc (MU).
- Holdings Distribution: QQQM features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in FTEC, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: Moderate Overlap & Balanced Dual Exposure
Combining QQQM and FTEC creates a moderate portfolio overlap of 50.6% by weight. While they share 24 common holdings, each ETF offers distinct sector weightings and strategy tilts that can complement a broader asset allocation strategy.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: QQQM vs FTEC
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
FTEC charges a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to QQQM at 0.15%. FTEC is 1.8x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $7 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
QQQM and FTEC react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining QQQM and FTEC impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: QQQM's largest sector is Information Technology (58.71%), whereas FTEC's largest sector is Information Technology (99.29%).
- Expense Ratio: FTEC has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. FTEC is 1.8x cheaper than QQQM.
- Portfolio Breadth: QQQM holds 0 total stocks vs FTEC's 0 stocks.

